Just my opinion

Guard Dad

Administrator
Staff member
Other opinions are welcome.

I've been reading up on this impeachment stuff somewhat, and here are some opinions I'm left with. I'm far from being a Constitutional scholar, but to me all this seems pretty clear.

1) The Constitution gives the president the authority to make foreign policy. He has the power of executive orders and also some latitude of executive privilege when dealing with foreign policy and leaders of other countries. I am of the opinion that even if he did use aid as a bargaining chip with Ukraine, he was well within his powers to do so. Under that thinking, he committed no crime and was acting well within his constitutional authority.

2) Executive privilege gives the president the authority to withhold information when national security is a factor. He was looking into the Biden mess which is potentially a national security issue because it potentially gave another country executive level access to the White House. So the obstruction charge is total BS.

3) As best I can tell, even the Democrats are admitting that no crime has been committed by Trump.

4) What does the Constitution say is grounds for impeachment?
Section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
The only verbiage that seems to fit here is "Bribery". But what does it mean in this context? I found this:

Bribery. The federal bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 201(b), criminalizes the corrupt promise or transfer of any thing of value to influence an official act of a federal official, a fraud on the United States, or the commission or omission of any act in violation of the official's duty.

Reading this, I don't think it applies to withholding aid to a foreign country, especially when the reason for it was our own national security. It seems to be geared more toward bribing our federal officials.

So what impeachable offense did Trump commit?

I still say this is nothing in the world but a 100% partisan made up charge to smear Trump in the public eye.

Thoughts or opinions?
 
I think many Presidents, regardless of party affiliation, could have faced impeachment for similar reasons had the opposing party held the House at the time and they had chosen to pursue action purely as a political stunt. The didn't, and they didn't for a reason. We are not privy to the deals and understandings which are made regularly in foreign affairs but I'm quite certain anything Trump may have done is not "illegal" or against our Constitution. It's just not who he is.
 
Mark Levin had a guest on his radio show last night who spoke about all the other Biden family members who enjoyed similar perks as Hunter. He called them the Biden 5.

The thing he brought up was the lack of curiosity the media had/has about any of this. Hunter is one small part of the equation when it comes to foreign influence and funds that, if any Trump Family member did anything close, would be excoriated before the deal had a chance to even begin.

I only heard about 15 minutes, and I am not sure of the guest's name who wrote the book using public sourced documents... NOT hearsay and anonymous witnesses like our media likes to do against republicans/conservatives.

Once I have time I need to look up the show... I think he does podcasts of all his shows.

The point was, Trump was correct to push to see the corrupt acts of Biden in Ukraine... Biden is trying to become President of our country... it is a national security problem. Our media will never report on it though. The Bidens are off limits as are the Clintons and all the other corrupt progressives.
 
The framers intentionally left it up to Congress with "high crimes and misdemeanors". I can't say that they envisioned just how divided and vitriolic our country would be now. It was assumed that the removal of a sitting President would be a last resort, not a calculated political ploy.
 
The framers intentionally left it up to Congress with "high crimes and misdemeanors". I can't say that they envisioned just how divided and vitriolic our country would be now. It was assumed that the removal of a sitting President would be a last resort, not a calculated political ploy.
I believe the framers assumed that the political parties, even in disagreement, would be doing what they thought best for our country.

Sadly, that is no longer the case.
 
Reading this, I don't think it applies to withholding aid to a foreign country, especially when the reason for it was our own national security.

How do we know for 100% sure that was the reason? The democrats are pushing one reason (to help Trump win the next election) and it is their burden to prove it. Absent a recording of Trump saying "I want Biden investigated so it'll help me win the election." coming out, proving it will be nearly impossible for the democrats. My opinion...yes, he wanted the investigation to hurt Biden's chances in the election (again...my opinion that I have no way or desire to prove). Even if proven, does that rise to the level of impeachment? No.


I think many Presidents, regardless of party affiliation, could have faced impeachment for similar reasons had the opposing party held the House at the time and they had chosen to pursue action purely as a political stunt.

Agreed and this impeachment is likely going to lead to many more impeachments in the future.
 
How do we know for 100% sure that was the reason? The democrats are pushing one reason (to help Trump win the next election) and it is their burden to prove it. Absent a recording of Trump saying "I want Biden investigated so it'll help me win the election." coming out, proving it will be nearly impossible for the democrats. My opinion...yes, he wanted the investigation to hurt Biden's chances in the election (again...my opinion that I have no way or desire to prove). Even if proven, does that rise to the level of impeachment? No.
My point was...even if he did as you say, it's within his authority as I understand it.
 
How do we know for 100% sure that was the reason? The democrats are pushing one reason (to help Trump win the next election) and it is their burden to prove it. Absent a recording of Trump saying "I want Biden investigated so it'll help me win the election." coming out, proving it will be nearly impossible for the democrats. My opinion...yes, he wanted the investigation to hurt Biden's chances in the election (again...my opinion that I have no way or desire to prove). Even if proven, does that rise to the level of impeachment? No.




Agreed and this impeachment is likely going to lead to many more impeachments in the future.
Only when Republicans hold the WH.
 
Back
Top