Proof Of Collusion...

This was actually known some time ago, but I guess they needed more to go on.

And no, I doubt the mainstream media will cover it.
 
FBI Uncovered Russian Bribery Plot Before Obama Approved Uranium One Deal, Netting Clintons Millions
the much larger Russian bombshell dropped today in the form ofnewly released FBI documents that reveal for the very first time that the Obama administration was well aware of illegal bribery, extortion and money laundering schemes being conducted by the Russians to get a foothold in the atomic energy business in the U.S. before approving a deal that handed them 20% of America's uranium reserves...and resulted in a windfall of donations to the Clinton Foundation.




Russian Purchase of US Uranium Assets in Return for $145mm in Contributions to the Clinton Foundation - Bill and Hillary Clinton assisted a Canadian financier, Frank Giustra, and his company, Uranium One, in the acquisition of uranium mining concessions in Kazakhstan and the United States. Subsequently, the Russian government sought to purchase Uranium One but required approval from the Obama administration given the strategic importance of the uranium assets. In the run-up to the approval of the deal by the State Department, nine shareholders of Uranium One just happened to make $145mm in donations to the Clinton Foundation. Moreover, the New Yorker confirmed that Bill Clinton received $500,000 in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank, with ties to the Kremlin, around the same time. Needless to say, the State Department approved the deal giving Russia ownership of 20% of U.S. uranium assets

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...lot-obama-approved-uranium-one-deal-netting-c
 
Last edited:

Watching Grassley is painful... he looks like a character actor who is the bad evil corrupt government official... his speech pattern is annoying and difficult to understand... we have known about almost all of this for YEARS, but it NEVER goes anywhere ... it is so boring to hear Grassly, I think everyone just changes the channel. We need some fresh representatives who have not lived in the swamp so long it is routine to speak of all this corruption in a monotone passive nasal drone.


Senate probes corrupt Russian money funneled to Clinton Foundation as FBI informant at scandal's center is revealed to have been gagged by Obama's Justice Department during 2016 campaign
  • Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is looking into a Russian uranium deal that Hillary Clinton signed off on as secretary of state
  • The deal happened amid companies associated with it giving donations to the Clinton Foundation and paying her husband Bill Clinton to speak
  • Now it's come to light that the company involved in the deal was being investigated by the FBI for bribery, extortion and money laundering
  • Yet the deal was approved, with Grassley now writing letters and seeking documents trying to find out why
  • The lawyer for an FBI informant on the deal told the Hill newspaper this week her client was told to sign a non-disclosure agreement and thus barred to speak out
  • She told the paper that he had information about how the Russians tried to woo Clinton and the Obama administration but wasn't allowed to speak to lawmakers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ussian-money-funneled-Clinton-Foundation.html
 
22528511_485821435122993_3773336257070484789_n.jpg
 
Jar-600a-LA.jpg


The FBI’s Political Meddling
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fbis-political-meddling-1508883468

FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...sian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration


Last week, blockbuster allegations surfaced in The Hill shedding light on what was happening inside the Obama administration and FBI while Russia was seeking control of massive amounts of our uranium supply. It turns out that the Obama administration inexplicably approved the uranium deal with Russia even though the FBI was investigating a massive corruption scheme that included bribery, extortion and other felonies involving Russia’s nuclear energy industry in the United States.

This level of accurate reporting, at the expense of the Clintons, is unprecedented for The Hill, which was once a major Clinton cheerleader.

Of course, accurate reporting has never been the mainstream media’s modus operandi. So what’s the real gameplan here?

Easy: to sacrifice the Clintons to advance the anti-Trump agenda.

Their next move: Burn the Clintons for their crimes to set a precedent to accuse Trump of similar criminality while claiming it isn’t politically motivated.

This is exactly what they did with the Weinstein scandal, and remember at one point the fallen producer was seen as “untouchable” just like the Clintons.

But will it work? Unlikely.

President Trump simply lacks the criminal nature of the Clintons, and the mainstream media lacks the influence to manipulate the public into believing otherwise.
 
Hillary Clinton has been keeping her face in front of the cameras a lot this year. I don't think it's just to promote her book either. I think she will continue to get her face in front of the cameras as much as possible. She plans to run for president again in 2020. Now that an investigation is being conducted about the Uranium deal, more evidence of her complicity will be revealed. She will use the same tactic she did while she was first lady; everything being said against her is a right-wing conspiracy. Much of her faithful followers will believe her when she says the evidence against her is manufactured and she will say the GOP has done this to her time and time again.

Now the big question is will she be criminally charged once their is evidence to prove her complicity? Quite frankly I don't think Trump would allow that to happen and she will get away with it once again. Remember how in the last presidential debate he said he would send her to jail, referring to her breaking the law using her private server to send classified info; then he reversed that position after taking office?

She will attempt to run for president again because she feels it's owed to her, but she will not get the support from the DNC she received the last time. Pretty much most of the DNC seems to find her now as someone who is toxic and cannot win. There will be another woman candidate for the Democrats because they feel it's time for one in the Oval Office.
 
Hillary Clinton has been keeping her face in front of the cameras a lot this year. I don't think it's just to promote her book either. I think she will continue to get her face in front of the cameras as much as possible. She plans to run for president again in 2020. Now that an investigation is being conducted about the Uranium deal, more evidence of her complicity will be revealed. She will use the same tactic she did while she was first lady; everything being said against her is a right-wing conspiracy. Much of her faithful followers will believe her when she says the evidence against her is manufactured and she will say the GOP has done this to her time and time again.

Now the big question is will she be criminally charged once their is evidence to prove her complicity? Quite frankly I don't think Trump would allow that to happen and she will get away with it once again. Remember how in the last presidential debate he said he would send her to jail, referring to her breaking the law using her private server to send classified info; then he reversed that position after taking office?

She will attempt to run for president again because she feels it's owed to her, but she will not get the support from the DNC she received the last time. Pretty much most of the DNC seems to find her now as someone who is toxic and cannot win. There will be another woman candidate for the Democrats because they feel it's time for one in the Oval Office.
I heard that Oprah Winfrey was positioning herself to run in 2020.
 
I don't think Hillary will be seen as healthy enough to be electable by the DNC. She is 70 now, and the campaign trail showed her frailness... coughing, fainting, collapsing.

Among all the recent WikiLeaks email dumps, perhaps the most important one of all has been overlooked by the mainstream media.

In it, Neera Tanden, Hillary Clinton’s longtime political guru, warned campaign manager John Podesta not to raise the question of primary opponent Bernie Sanders’ health because it would draw unwanted attention to the hidden truth about Hillary’s health.

“Hard to think of anything more counter-productive than demanding Bernie’s medical records,” Mr. Tanden emailed Mr. Podesta, according to an email obtained by WikiLeaks from Mr. Podesta’s personal inbox.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/16/hillary-clintons-health-problems/
 
Back
Top