Electric vehicles....

306638722_3244712222513694_1240911978540386013_n.jpg
 
Yeah, and most homes don't have the electrical service to run much more amperage than the fast chargers are now.

Yeah, but most people charging at home don't need it to charge that fast. Charging overnight at current fast speeds is sufficient for most. Charging time while traveling is an issue though.
 
Just rough numbers, but to charge that Telsa battery in 1 hour is around 225 amps at 390V for an hour.

To do in 15 min over 900 Amps at 390V.

That is a stupid amount of current. The wire to carry 400Amps is 1.6 cm in diameter, over 1/2 inch. (if copper, Aluminum wire would be 2 cm in diameter) Figure you double or triple that to carry the 900Amps safely. Oops. a wire 1 1/2 inches in diameter will be heavy as heck and tough to bend and move. Then the wiring inside the car has to be able to carry the current safely.

Just don't see it working.
 
Just rough numbers, but to charge that Telsa battery in 1 hour is around 225 amps at 390V for an hour.

To do in 15 min over 900 Amps at 390V.

That is a stupid amount of current. The wire to carry 400Amps is 1.6 cm in diameter, over 1/2 inch. (if copper, Aluminum wire would be 2 cm in diameter) Figure you double or triple that to carry the 900Amps safely. Oops. a wire 1 1/2 inches in diameter will be heavy as heck and tough to bend and move. Then the wiring inside the car has to be able to carry the current safely.

Just don't see it working.

Nerd!
 
I thought this was a joke...but it isn't:

 
I thought this was a joke...but it isn't:

Apparently some have much more faith in the Energizer bunny than me.
 
I thought this was a joke...but it isn't:

As little as 124 miles of range.

Where are they going to fly to?
 
As little as 124 miles of range.

Where are they going to fly to?

There are a lot of shorter routes both up there and down here (Hartsfield to Macon for instance).

That should be the range after taking off the FAA mandatory requirement for diversions and delayIn addition to the en route fuel, alternate fuel, and the 10 percent en route reserve fuel, § 121.645(b)(4) requires the airplane to have enough fuel to fly for 30 minutes at holding speed at 1,500 feet above the alternate airport, or the destination airport if no alternate is required by § 121.621(a)(2) or 121.623(b).

I'm wondering how smaller airports will have the power capacity to charge this sucker in only 30 minutes. That's a LOT of juice.

Also it appears they have turbo generators on board as well to extend the range, that might be how they are meeting the divert rules.
 
There are a lot of shorter routes both up there and down here (Hartsfield to Macon for instance).



I'm wondering how smaller airports will have the power capacity to charge this sucker in only 30 minutes. That's a LOT of juice.

Also it appears they have turbo generators on board as well to extend the range, that might be how they are meeting the divert rules.
What I thought they could and probably should do is have quick change battery packs. A couple of routes that are popular from NYC are the NYC to Boston and the NYC to DC that are commuter runs,,, maybe our ultra-Green politicians should be the first to fly it!!!
 
What I thought they could and probably should do is have quick change battery packs. A couple of routes that are popular from NYC are the NYC to Boston and the NYC to DC that are commuter runs,,, maybe our ultra-Green politicians should be the first to fly it!!!
That's what I thought they would do, then a driver could quickly "re-fuel" by sliding in a fresh pack.

But, they are using many different sizes of batteries and building the vehicles in a "skateboard" design so the batteries are very low in the vehicle. I get one reason why, a low center of gravity, but you have to pull the body off some of these to replace the batteries when the time comes.
 
Back
Top