Now this is an interesting development

The Sound Guy

Pursuit Driver
I'm wondering if this is showing a split in Black American support of the Liberal parties... The last two paragraphs has the really interesting development:

Breitbard

********
Firearm Ownership Surging Among Black Americans amid Nationwide Run on Firearms

Gun ownership is surging among black Americans as stores across the country report that the run on guns and ammunition is continuing. Politico reports that black Americans have been arming themselves “since the beginning of the pandemic.”

National African American Gun Owners’ Association (NAAGA) president Philip Smith has seen as many as 2,000 new members a day since coronavirus warnings and shutdowns began impacting the country earlier this year. That rush in membership only continued following the May 25, 2020, death of George Floyd. Smith intimated that the very onset of the coronavirus made some black Americans give gun ownership serious thought for the first time: “If you have a half a brain in your head even saying, ‘Oh, this might get serious, let me plan accordingly.'”

His group “has grown to more than 30,000 members” this year and has nearly 90,000 online followers. On June 11, 2020, PRNewswire reported that “90% of NAAGA’s members are African American, more than half of them women, and over 1,000 are law enforcement and military.” Black Gun Owners Association’s Derrick Morgan also explained the increase in black American gun ownership by presenting through a prism of coronavirus fears, but he also pointed to police response times. Morgan said, “A lot of people are reaching out to us, mainly new gun owners and people who wouldn’t have considered owning a gun or firearm for their protection, have been lining up to purchase firearms and access information from our website.”

NAAGA’s Philip Smith suggested black American’s growing interest in gun ownership and self-defense is too big to be a fad. He said, “The days are over of African Americans sitting around singing Kumbaya and hoping and praying that somebody will come and save them. We’re gonna save ourselves, and any politician that wants our vote moving forward, they better be on the side of our thinking otherwise, you’re not gonna get our vote. We’re not gonna be sheep anymore.”

On July 13, 2020, the Brookings Institution put forth research that showed past runs on guns have frequently been an outgrowth of fear of gun control. Brookings specifically pointed to spikes in gun sales that followed the December 14, 2012, Sandy Hook attack, the December 2, 2015, San Bernardino attack, and the February 14, 2018, Parkland high school shooting. After pointing to those incidents, they noted that the current surge in sales, based on fears of safety and a desire for self-defense, far surpasses the surges that were based on fear of gun control.
 
While you weren’t paying attention, Democrats introduced a bill that would massively increase taxes on guns and ammo (op-ed)
Posted by: Pat Droney|July 31, 2020


One of the main components of the House bill is the confiscatory taxes that would be levied on firearms and ammunition. Under the proposal, pistols, revolvers, and other firearms would be taxable at 30%. Ammunition, shotgun, and rifle cartridges would be taxable at 50%. So, if they cannot take the weapons away, they will make it cost prohibitive to own and use firearms.

Under the U.S. code, a firearm is defined as “any weapon (including a starter gun) which will…expel a projectile by the action of an explosive,” or “any destructive device.” Destructive devices are defined as bombs, grenades, rockets, missiles, mines, or similar instruments.

Ammunition is defined as “bullets, cartridge cases, powders and primers designed to be used in a firearm,” according to federal law.
 
While you weren’t paying attention, Democrats introduced a bill that would massively increase taxes on guns and ammo (op-ed)
Posted by: Pat Droney|July 31, 2020


One of the main components of the House bill is the confiscatory taxes that would be levied on firearms and ammunition. Under the proposal, pistols, revolvers, and other firearms would be taxable at 30%. Ammunition, shotgun, and rifle cartridges would be taxable at 50%. So, if they cannot take the weapons away, they will make it cost prohibitive to own and use firearms.

Under the U.S. code, a firearm is defined as “any weapon (including a starter gun) which will…expel a projectile by the action of an explosive,” or “any destructive device.” Destructive devices are defined as bombs, grenades, rockets, missiles, mines, or similar instruments.

Ammunition is defined as “bullets, cartridge cases, powders and primers designed to be used in a firearm,” according to federal law.
We're all still trying to figure out what's going on even now. Guns are in short supply, and ammo is very hard to come by. I realize it's in demand, but I think supply would have caught up by now.
 
The supply chain should have recovered by now.

Depends on where it's manufactured I would think. The "Global" economy that the Liberals are pushing on us can have one little part that is needed come from somewhere else and stop the entire process. Googling it, I see that most primers are made with lead styphnate, something I'd never heard of before. Since it contains lead, I would expect the EPA to have zillions of rules on how it's made here in the US and disposal of waste products.
 
Depends on where it's manufactured I would think. The "Global" economy that the Liberals are pushing on us can have one little part that is needed come from somewhere else and stop the entire process. Googling it, I see that most primers are made with lead styphnate, something I'd never heard of before. Since it contains lead, I would expect the EPA to have zillions of rules on how it's made here in the US and disposal of waste products.
The question is...is government intentionally hampering ammo production since they can't make guns illegal?
 
Back
Top