newsjunky said:I am surprised that it has not been posted here. He was challenged by a voter yesterday. The charge was that he did not live in Paulding County. I really thought there would be some comments on that from the Hwy.
Winchester said:Guys, the person who filed the complaint is a member here and the other site. I have known him for many years. He would not have filed the complaint with proof-positive evidence.
Winchester said:Guys, the person who filed the complaint is a member here and the other site. I have known him for many years. He would not have filed the complaint with proof-positive evidence.
Winchester said:Guys, the person who filed the complaint is a member here and the other site. I have known him for many years. He would not have filed the complaint with proof-positive evidence.
LisaC said:I applaud him for bringing this information to light. But there are at least two sides to every story (more depending on the number of media outlets involved).
Amen Madea! We all get to vote on all candidates for school board. I think the evidence speaks for itself. If all of that is true he needs a lawyer because he could have some trouble coming his way in my opinion. I have no way of knowing one way or the other. :whistleMadea said:I personally think we ALL have a dog in this race. Regardless of where we live in Paulding or what stage our life is in. The value of our local schools does translate to the value of our homes, communities and way of life.
:thumbsupGuard Dad said:Winchester said:Guys, the person who filed the complaint is a member here and the other site. I have known him for many years. He would not have filed the complaint with proof-positive evidence.
It certainly looked like he did his homework.