Well, isn't that classy of her

The sadest part is that's precisely why he was elected. His voters would cheer if he walked into the White House and shot that "MF".
 
Thought 'it' was a woman... :)

IMO the DEMS are just digging themselves a hole... they are gonna have to live in...
Yeah, it is gonna take some time... however IMO the public is waking up.
From what I read... half or better of the DEM reps that were elected in November... would NOT have won with an honest election.
 
Of course the mainstream democrats may like it that the newbies are getting the press. It will make their proposed laws look almost normal in comparison.
 
And folks thought Trump was brash...

Trump has class compared to:
The lady from Michigan... with her potty mouth...
The lady from Wisconsin... that married her brother to gain citizenship...
The lady from the Bronx... who does not understand what authority and team mean...
The Senator from AZ... who wears pink Tutu's
OTOH... the governor of AZ appointed the looser of that race: Ms McSally (the former A-10 pilot) to the seat of John McCain.
And the list goes on...
Sheesh...

The GOP and Trump are gonna look passe compared to the DEMS
 
It's just lady locker room talk.


I have to mention, though, that no one thought Trump was being classy with his "grab them by the p****", (I knew what you were referring to) and no one I know condones it. Our only point was that it was just crude talk, not actual assault as some tried to say. And he made it in what he thought was private with another guy. Fact is; a lot men and women talk crude crap to their friends. I will go as far to say that most men do it, and a whole lot of women do to. And again, it's not nice, but it's just talking smack.

This gal is a newly elected member of the House, who made this statement in a large gathering. What she did wasn't illegal, it doesn't disqualify her for her job. However, her statement does apply directly to her roll in government and what her main goal is, where Trump's crude statement did not. Trump's statement that was caught in a live mic has had zero to do with his job as POTUS. If this newly elected representative follows through with her threat, it will affect her performance.

One other difference is that she willingly used the profanity in front of a large group. IMO, that was worse than Trump saying what he said to one guy, not knowing he was being recorded. I still don't condone either, though.

Regarding impeachment...regardless what any of us think of Trump, there has not been one shred of of evidence produced on him yet that constitutes impeachment. Maybe some will come out, we don't know yet. But for any of the Representatives to suggest impeachment at this point is nothing but partisan ugliness. So the lady was very much out of line, both with her crude language and her intent to impeach before an impeachable offense has been proven.
 
I have to mention, though, that no one thought Trump was being classy with his "grab them by the p****", (I knew what you were referring to) and no one I know condones it. Our only point was that it was just crude talk, not actual assault as some tried to say. And he made it in what he thought was private with another guy. Fact is; a lot men and women talk crude crap to their friends. I will go as far to say that most men do it, and a whole lot of women do to. And again, it's not nice, but it's just talking smack.

This gal is a newly elected member of the House, who made this statement in a large gathering. What she did wasn't illegal, it doesn't disqualify her for her job. However, her statement does apply directly to her roll in government and what her main goal is, where Trump's crude statement did not. Trump's statement that was caught in a live mic has had zero to do with his job as POTUS. If this newly elected representative follows through with her threat, it will affect her performance.

One other difference is that she willingly used the profanity in front of a large group. IMO, that was worse than Trump saying what he said to one guy, not knowing he was being recorded. I still don't condone either, though.

Regarding impeachment...regardless what any of us think of Trump, there has not been one shred of of evidence produced on him yet that constitutes impeachment. Maybe some will come out, we don't know yet. But for any of the Representatives to suggest impeachment at this point is nothing but partisan ugliness. So the lady was very much out of line, both with her crude language and her intent to impeach before an impeachable offense has been proven.
She doesn't want him impeached for any demonstrable action he was involved in, she wants him removed from office because she and her supporters hate him. To many liberals, that is cause.
 
She doesn't want him impeached for any demonstrable action he was involved in, she wants him removed from office because she and her supporters hate him. To many liberals, that is cause.

And since liberals think the law should be changed at will, to suite their agenda (there are endless examples to prove they have this attitude)...
Expect some behind the scenes dealing to arrange laws the left can use against Trump.
 
I can't stand him and I hate him being president. That is certainly not just a liberal stance. It was mostly just a joke though...
I don't like Trump either. I didn't like Obama. However I didn't threaten impeachment because we very strongly disagreed and Obama was a lying asshole. Some folks of course did, but hate isn't a reason to override a lawful election, and both men we're elected lawfully.

Personally I find the Mueler investigation disgusting. It has far exceeded the original mandate, and the evidence of bias in the investigation is strong. Yet in almost two years it has produced nothing that a reasonable person would call an impeachable offense against Trump.

The Democrats will impeach him because the term "high crimes and misdemeanors" is laughably broad. But they will have virtually zilch for evidence and the so called crime will be a serious stretch.
 
I don't like Trump either. I didn't like Obama. However I didn't threaten impeachment because we very strongly disagreed and Obama was a lying asshole. Some folks of course did, but hate isn't a reason to override a lawful election, and both men we're elected lawfully.

Personally I find the Mueler investigation disgusting. It has far exceeded the original mandate, and the evidence of bias in the investigation is strong. Yet in almost two years it has produced nothing that a reasonable person would call an impeachable offense against Trump.

The Democrats will impeach him because the term "high crimes and misdemeanors" is laughably broad. But they will have virtually zilch for evidence and the so called crime will be a serious stretch.
Due to the fact that I am hugely politically outnumbered here, and the fact that I'm tired of debating about Trump in general, I will just simply say that for an innocent guy, he sure does act guilty.
 
Due to the fact that I am hugely politically outnumbered here, and the fact that I'm tired of debating about Trump in general, I will just simply say that for an innocent guy, he sure does act guilty.
He acts horribly. He's a pathological liar, even about things that don't matter. He's a self absorbed egomaniac. He's rude. He has a Napoleon complex. He's ignorant. He ignores policy experts and valid evidence. I could go on. There are a lot of very good reasons to dislike him and to not want him to be President. But none of these things are impeachable offenses.
 
Lessee if I can pour a little gasoline on this fire... :cool:

I really could care LESS how PRESIDENT Trump behaves...

What I care about...
Is PRESIDENT Trump fixes the damage the left and RINOS have done to the USA every sine Reagan.

Let the flames fly... :D
 
Back
Top